In Rio de Janeiro state, 2.5% of the municipal share of ICMS is distributed by environmental criteria. This tool estimates a municipality's position in the IFCA from three sub-indices: Protected Areas (UCs), Water Resources, and Basic Sanitation.
Fill in the three blocks with official data from the Rio de Janeiro municipality. The simulator combines the sub-indices with the weights set by State Decree 41.844/2009 and returns an estimate of the IFCA, the tier, and the implication on the transfer.
Fill in the indicators above to see the implication on the transfer.
The IFCA is the weighted average of three environmental sub-indices. Each sub-index has a weight fixed by the regulatory decree, and the final result is converted into a municipal ranking by CEPERJ.
| Sub-index | Weight | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| UCs (ICA-UC) | 45% | Area of UCs in the municipality weighted by category (Strict Protection counts more than Sustainable Use). |
| Water (ICA-RH) | 30% | Quality of water sources and management of water resources, including the existence of a municipal plan. |
| Sanitation (ICA-SB) | 25% | Coverage of sewage collection, effluent treatment, and selective solid waste collection. |
The weights come from State Decree 41.844/2009, which regulated Law 5.100/2007. The official calculation is performed annually by CEPERJ based on consolidated data from INEA, IBGE, SNIS, and ANA.
Each simulator field has a primary official source. Cross-checking the databases reduces error and brings the estimate closer to the calculation published by CEPERJ.
This simulator is a pedagogical estimate. It combines the three sub-indices with the official weights (45% / 30% / 25%) and returns an approximate IFCA, but the official calculation published by CEPERJ involves detailed formulas inside each sub-index, with normalization against the state average, weighting by UC category, and quality factors that change from year to year.
Small differences in UC category or in water source quality can significantly change the result. A municipality with the same UC area may score much higher if the predominant category is Strict Protection rather than Sustainable Use. For this reason, the screen above uses a single factor per category; the official calculation performs a weighting by SNUC category.
For real fiscal and environmental decisions, always consult the official ranking published by CEPERJ for the current fiscal year. The tool serves for internal diagnosis and prioritization of public environmental policies, never as the sole basis for budget forecasting of the actual transfer.
Texts consolidated in the Arsenic Library, with notes on relevant amendments, plus the official CEPERJ portal for the current ranking.
This simulator is for informational purposes. In case of divergence, the official calculation published by CEPERJ and the current text of State Law 5.100/2007 and State Decree 41.844/2009 prevail.